An earthquake what is happening nationally in trade unions. Quake resulted from political and trade union strategies that have the flavor a pure manipulation of the issues.
The reference is to the current accusations exchanged between the various leaders of the confederal unions about a private meeting between Berlusconi, CISL and UIL excluded from participation in the CGIL. All hell broke loose, Epifani and splits acknowledge the union CGIL and proclaimed a strike everything. Bonanni and Angeletti replied that there was no meeting or dinner, whatever you want and that this is just an excuse to justify a solitary strike already budgeted for a long time, for reasons that look like clear strategies exclusively political. In short, as always, the three shows that are more attentive to the political reality that union. To accuse this allegation means that they are accustomed to such conduct and certain corporate logic. A nice article about this was written by Massimo Giannini, columnist di Repubblica, “Se prevale l'ideologia” nel quale osserva l'attuale scenario politico sindacale. Lo stesso dice “Inadeguato è il governo, ma inadeguato è anche il sindacato. La drammaticità del momento richiederebbe quello che un tempo si sarebbe definito un equilibrio più avanzato. Uno sforzo unitario, piuttosto che la ricerca di una distinzione. - le piattaforme rivendicative e le azioni di lotta di Cgil, Cisl e Uil, tanto più se frammentate e contraddittorie tra loro, finiscono per assumere una fisionomia fatalmente corporativa, che spesso tutela chi è già tutelato e magari lascia scoperto chi non gode di alcuna protezione sociale. - scelte scontate e probabilmente autolesioniste. Un grande leader sindacale come Luciano Lama would never have done. "
Just a nice, nothing to say. Unfortunately there are no more major trade union figures of the past, men with firm ideals and cleaning behavior has not reflected that today. What is most depressing is that they also changed the original forces that moved the old trade unions. terribly depressing because everything is found at the local level. The same confederations that are organized secret meetings, decide where in cahoots with the various government employee future of the whole class , trampling on the true representativeness of the autonomist movements or a base. Alitalia is the most striking and modern. An agreement led by the CAI with trade union federations and central government. The base that keeps asking to be able to shake off the dictatorship of the CGIL, CISL, UIL and UGL. Some posts ago we showed a couple of photos depicting where the employees of Alitalia with signs reading: "We do not represent, do not sign." And 'the mirror of the current situation with a triple that their bargaining representative stifles the real needs of workers as well as forcing them to fight against various employers, even against those who should protect them. Just take the distances from the CGIL, CISL and UIL accused of playing incorrectly excluded from the comparison and trade unions. Disgraceful conduct, CISL and UIL (this is not news), but realizes the CGIL only when the effects of this marginalization suffered by her union are in person.
If this is not ideologically acceptable, and here I go down to the local level, to remind themselves that they do CGIL union did not deviate much from that of their allies. Confederations of their colleagues there Stranizza, because we are accustomed to their behavior and then the color of their flag is different from ours. Perhaps the CGIL has forgotten this, or rather pretend not to notice.
Stranizza Why do not you cry or in the plot where the administration of Palermo meets secretly with them leaving out any other names? Maybe because they care only for their presence. Unfortunately, the correctness and ideological cleansing of association and behavior is a luxury that the letters arranged in a top-down can not afford. The thing that I can not understand is that when you fight for every problem, agreements in the end shake is always a compromise. An agreement to settle in order not to lose even one (this is what they say at the end of each agreement). And here comes back the strategy of fear used to manipulate and control minds. It 'a perfect system, bomb-proof. So in the end it is they who decide the future of all. Even if the base would not be an agreement will not say why must eventually submit to the will of those who do not live and is not even part of the problem in question sits at the negotiating table by deciding for others. Here, the various local business and trade union representation should be handled exclusively by the Joint Union Representatives, as a direct expression of the will of workers. What is the sense that municipalities sit at the negotiating table and sign (and with what weight) components of the union decided on social secretariats? What is the point that the true will of the working class is relegated to a set of figures that share a unique figure in the RSU, which is hampered in its operation from the various municipalities, but even more from the same answering trade union confederations? The secretariats have a big interest to the RSU does not work because it consists of individuality at times difficult to shape. Individuality that getting the consent directly by the workers have a moral duty towards them. Remain in some way related to employment because they are an integral part. Difficult to those who receive the "anointing" by the secretariats, cut the umbilical cord with employees, distorting their ideology aligns imposed on him.
understand well that the interest is extreme by the unions not to lose their weight in a decentralized manner. They want to control everything and we allow this to happen without resistance, but perhaps there is a reason ... ... ... ...
CiccioSpena (RSU Public Employment Cobas Palermo)
The reference is to the current accusations exchanged between the various leaders of the confederal unions about a private meeting between Berlusconi, CISL and UIL excluded from participation in the CGIL. All hell broke loose, Epifani and splits acknowledge the union CGIL and proclaimed a strike everything. Bonanni and Angeletti replied that there was no meeting or dinner, whatever you want and that this is just an excuse to justify a solitary strike already budgeted for a long time, for reasons that look like clear strategies exclusively political. In short, as always, the three shows that are more attentive to the political reality that union. To accuse this allegation means that they are accustomed to such conduct and certain corporate logic. A nice article about this was written by Massimo Giannini, columnist di Repubblica, “Se prevale l'ideologia” nel quale osserva l'attuale scenario politico sindacale. Lo stesso dice “Inadeguato è il governo, ma inadeguato è anche il sindacato. La drammaticità del momento richiederebbe quello che un tempo si sarebbe definito un equilibrio più avanzato. Uno sforzo unitario, piuttosto che la ricerca di una distinzione. - le piattaforme rivendicative e le azioni di lotta di Cgil, Cisl e Uil, tanto più se frammentate e contraddittorie tra loro, finiscono per assumere una fisionomia fatalmente corporativa, che spesso tutela chi è già tutelato e magari lascia scoperto chi non gode di alcuna protezione sociale. - scelte scontate e probabilmente autolesioniste. Un grande leader sindacale come Luciano Lama would never have done. "
Just a nice, nothing to say. Unfortunately there are no more major trade union figures of the past, men with firm ideals and cleaning behavior has not reflected that today. What is most depressing is that they also changed the original forces that moved the old trade unions. terribly depressing because everything is found at the local level. The same confederations that are organized secret meetings, decide where in cahoots with the various government employee future of the whole class , trampling on the true representativeness of the autonomist movements or a base. Alitalia is the most striking and modern. An agreement led by the CAI with trade union federations and central government. The base that keeps asking to be able to shake off the dictatorship of the CGIL, CISL, UIL and UGL. Some posts ago we showed a couple of photos depicting where the employees of Alitalia with signs reading: "We do not represent, do not sign." And 'the mirror of the current situation with a triple that their bargaining representative stifles the real needs of workers as well as forcing them to fight against various employers, even against those who should protect them. Just take the distances from the CGIL, CISL and UIL accused of playing incorrectly excluded from the comparison and trade unions. Disgraceful conduct, CISL and UIL (this is not news), but realizes the CGIL only when the effects of this marginalization suffered by her union are in person.
If this is not ideologically acceptable, and here I go down to the local level, to remind themselves that they do CGIL union did not deviate much from that of their allies. Confederations of their colleagues there Stranizza, because we are accustomed to their behavior and then the color of their flag is different from ours. Perhaps the CGIL has forgotten this, or rather pretend not to notice. Stranizza Why do not you cry or in the plot where the administration of Palermo meets secretly with them leaving out any other names? Maybe because they care only for their presence. Unfortunately, the correctness and ideological cleansing of association and behavior is a luxury that the letters arranged in a top-down can not afford. The thing that I can not understand is that when you fight for every problem, agreements in the end shake is always a compromise. An agreement to settle in order not to lose even one (this is what they say at the end of each agreement). And here comes back the strategy of fear used to manipulate and control minds. It 'a perfect system, bomb-proof. So in the end it is they who decide the future of all. Even if the base would not be an agreement will not say why must eventually submit to the will of those who do not live and is not even part of the problem in question sits at the negotiating table by deciding for others. Here, the various local business and trade union representation should be handled exclusively by the Joint Union Representatives, as a direct expression of the will of workers. What is the sense that municipalities sit at the negotiating table and sign (and with what weight) components of the union decided on social secretariats? What is the point that the true will of the working class is relegated to a set of figures that share a unique figure in the RSU, which is hampered in its operation from the various municipalities, but even more from the same answering trade union confederations? The secretariats have a big interest to the RSU does not work because it consists of individuality at times difficult to shape. Individuality that getting the consent directly by the workers have a moral duty towards them. Remain in some way related to employment because they are an integral part. Difficult to those who receive the "anointing" by the secretariats, cut the umbilical cord with employees, distorting their ideology aligns imposed on him.
understand well that the interest is extreme by the unions not to lose their weight in a decentralized manner. They want to control everything and we allow this to happen without resistance, but perhaps there is a reason ... ... ... ...
CiccioSpena (RSU Public Employment Cobas Palermo)
0 comments:
Post a Comment