PRESS STAMPASPALLITTA
no to a second APCOA Nadia Spallitta, adviser to the group Another story is part of the Committee Urban - said:
"offices of the resolution concerning the parking of Piazza Unità d'Italy, so that the same be reworked and made to comply with PRUSST is already approved by the Department that the City Council. In fact, in the original proposal and draft Siageco approved within the PRUSST, was in no way provided for the granting of free 2,700 stalls to the company Siageco he intends to put the parking garage. It is not clear, therefore, as in a resolution that would only ratify the PRUSST is introduced a radical change that disrupts the economic and financial evaluation that had been considered advantageous offer of private, or home in which this change has been provided. If this decision were to go forward, there would be a huge economic loss for the city, unimprovviso dell'AMAT impoverishment and an incredible advantage to the individual (think of the daily earnings multiplied by 2,700 stalls) with no resolution emerges from what the corresponding and adequate public interest is pursued. Consider then that, in terms of legitimacy, the ruling is contrary to the prohibition of setting up stalls without the urban traffic plan and without the creation of as many free car parks that it does not do. E 'singular, too, that the private company seeking to influence the liberal political judgments and choices of advisors threatening them with claims for damages, very serious that we may bring to the attention of the judiciary. I think, finally, beyond the statement, even within the majority does not emerge a unified position and there is some difficulty in taking responsibility subsequent to the adoption of this act "
"offices of the resolution concerning the parking of Piazza Unità d'Italy, so that the same be reworked and made to comply with PRUSST is already approved by the Department that the City Council. In fact, in the original proposal and draft Siageco approved within the PRUSST, was in no way provided for the granting of free 2,700 stalls to the company Siageco he intends to put the parking garage. It is not clear, therefore, as in a resolution that would only ratify the PRUSST is introduced a radical change that disrupts the economic and financial evaluation that had been considered advantageous offer of private, or home in which this change has been provided. If this decision were to go forward, there would be a huge economic loss for the city, unimprovviso dell'AMAT impoverishment and an incredible advantage to the individual (think of the daily earnings multiplied by 2,700 stalls) with no resolution emerges from what the corresponding and adequate public interest is pursued. Consider then that, in terms of legitimacy, the ruling is contrary to the prohibition of setting up stalls without the urban traffic plan and without the creation of as many free car parks that it does not do. E 'singular, too, that the private company seeking to influence the liberal political judgments and choices of advisors threatening them with claims for damages, very serious that we may bring to the attention of the judiciary. I think, finally, beyond the statement, even within the majority does not emerge a unified position and there is some difficulty in taking responsibility subsequent to the adoption of this act "
Palermo, October 30 2008
Spallitta Nadia - Another Story
group 
0 comments:
Post a Comment